• 30 dagen retourgarantie 
  • Gratis verzending vanaf 4 boeken of 40 euro
  • Alle boeken met zorg gecontroleerd

HATE

Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship
Maak tweedehands je eerste keus
  • Voor klanten in België: door stakingen kan je pakket later aankomen.
  • 30 dagen retourgarantie 
  • Gratis verzending vanaf 4 boeken of 40 euro
  • Alle boeken met zorg gecontroleerd
  • Voor 15:00u besteld, dezelfde dag verzonden

19,85

Hoe tweedehands wil je het hebben?
HATE
HATE
Beetje gebruikt
19,85
10000190405
component.product.quantitySelect.legend
ISBN
9780190859121
Bindwijze
Hardcover
Taal
Engels
Uitgeverij
Oxford University Press Inc
Jaar van uitgifte
2018
Aantal pagina's
232

Waar gaat het over?

In HATE: Why We Should Resist it With Free Speech, Not Censorship, Strossen dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech," and shows that the U.S. First Amendment approach effectively promotes all pertinent concerns: free speech, democracy, equality and societal harmony HATE dispels misunderstandings plaguing our perennial debates about hate speech vs. free speech, showing that the First Amendment approach promotes free speech and democracy, equality, and societal harmony. We hear too many incorrect assertions that hate speech which has no generally accepted definition is either absolutely unprotected or absolutely protected from censorship. Rather, U.S. law allows government to punish hateful or discriminatory speech in specific contexts when it directly causes imminent serious harm, but government may not punish such speech solely because its message is disfavored, disturbing, or vaguely feared to possibly contribute to some future harm. When U.S. officials formerly wielded such broad censorship power, they suppressed dissident speech, including equal rights advocacy. Likewise, current politicians have attacked Black Lives Matter protests as hate speech. Hate speech censorship proponents stress the potential harms such speech might further: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from many countries, this book shows that hate speech laws are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Their inevitably vague terms invest enforcing officials with broad discretion; predictably, regular targets are minority views and speakers. Therefore, prominent social justice advocates in the U.S. and beyond maintain that the best way to resist hate and promote equality is not censorship, but rather, vigorous counterspeech and activism.
Lees verder

Recensies

Gemiddelde waardering van 0 van 5 sterren

0 recensies