• 30 dagen retourgarantie 
  • Gratis verzending vanaf 4 boeken of 40 euro
  • Alle boeken met zorg gecontroleerd

Revelation

From Metaphor to Analogy
Maak tweedehands je eerste keus
  • 30 dagen retourgarantie 
  • Gratis verzending vanaf 4 boeken of 40 euro
  • Alle boeken met zorg gecontroleerd
  • Voor 15:00u besteld, dezelfde dag verzonden
  • Van 13 tm 29 maart 3+1 op alle boeken
3+1 actie
Niet op voorraad... Seintje? Vul je e-mail adres in en wij sturen je een e-mail als het boek weer op voorraad is.
ISBN
9780199212477
Bindwijze
Paperback
Taal
Engels
Uitgeverij
Oxford University Press
Jaar van uitgifte
2007
Aantal pagina's
373

Waar gaat het over?

The great religions often claim that their books or creeds contain truths revealed by God. How could we know that they do? In the second edition of Revelation, renowned philosopher of religion Richard Swinburne addresses this central question. But since the books of great religions often contain much poetry and parable, Swinburne begins by investigating how eternal truth can be conveyed in unfamiliar genres, by analogy and metaphor, within false presuppositions about science and history. In the final part of the book, Swinburne then applies the results of Parts I and II to assessing the evidence that the teaching of the Christian Church constitutes a revelation from God. In the course of his philosophical exploration, Swinburne considers how the church which Jesus founded is to be identified today and presents a sustained discussion of which passages in the Bible should be understood literally and which should be understood metaphorically. This is a fuller and entirely rewritten second edition of Revelation, the most notable new feature of which is a long chapter examining whether traditional Christian claims about personal morality (divorce, homosexuality, abortion, etc.) can be regarded as revealed truths. A formal appendix shows how the structure of evidence supporting the Christian revelation can be articulated in terms of the probability calculus (and shows that Plantinga's well-known argument from 'dwindling probabilities' against probabilistic arguments of this kind is not cogent).
Lees verder

Recensies

Gemiddelde waardering van 0 van 5 sterren

0 recensies